Build log
TradeSync: making the preview more important than the execute button
How TradeSync separates scoring, risk review and execution authority—and why its public cockpit had to distinguish demo data from paper operation before live trading could even be discussed.
Source: Public repository: chasedndt/TradeSync (README, preview/risk contracts and dated change records)
Technical bibliography record
The build, in five parts.
- 01 Built
- TradeSync is now locally verified as a paper-research workstation over live Hyperliquid observations. The core seven-stage path and current feed health are inspectable in the cockpit, while Hermes remains advisory and execution authority remains locked. This site does not convert connectivity into a claim of uninterrupted uptime, live trade execution, autonomous authority or financial performance.
- 02 Process
- TradeSync turns funding, open interest, cumulative volume delta, price structure and technical indicators into inspectable directional scores. The difficult part is not producing a long or short label. It is preserving enough evidence and state around that label for a person to understand what the system believes, what could invalidate it and whether an execution path is allowed to proceed.
- 03 Learned
- How TradeSync separates scoring, risk review and execution authority—and why its public cockpit had to distinguish demo data from paper operation before live trading could even be discussed.
- 04 Skills
- architecturetrading-systemsriskdry-run
- 05 Saved
- Source boundary: Public repository: chasedndt/TradeSync (README, preview/risk contracts and dated change records)
Context#
TradeSync turns funding, open interest, cumulative volume delta, price structure and technical indicators into inspectable directional scores. The difficult part is not producing a long or short label. It is preserving enough evidence and state around that label for a person to understand what the system believes, what could invalidate it and whether an execution path is allowed to proceed.
One scoring and risk pipeline#
The public Phase 3D record documents a shared tradesync_core library for scoring, risk and symbol normalisation. Services import that canonical logic, while an offline replay runner sends historical JSONL events through the same calculate-score, enhanced-score and RiskGuardian sequence. That avoids the dangerous version of a backtest: one that quietly evaluates different rules from the live-facing services.
A truthful cockpit is part of the safety system#
A March 2026 public audit removed hard-coded flow metrics and fake event lines, replaced a static dry-run badge with backend-derived state, separated DEMO from PAPER and LIVE, and disabled Copilot and source-upload surfaces that did not exist yet. Those fixes matter because a trading dashboard that cannot distinguish mock positions from connected paper operation is not merely unfinished; it gives the operator the wrong mental model.
Current boundary#
TradeSync is now locally verified as a paper-research workstation over live Hyperliquid observations. The core seven-stage path and current feed health are inspectable in the cockpit, while Hermes remains advisory and execution authority remains locked. This site does not convert connectivity into a claim of uninterrupted uptime, live trade execution, autonomous authority or financial performance.
Next proof#
The next credible milestone is not a louder autonomy claim. It is a reproducible paper evaluation where the same versioned scoring and risk rules produce a reviewable preview, a blocked-or-allowed result and an outcome record—without silently crossing into live execution.