Project catalogue: making status, identity and responsive proof agree

Deployed and live-verified1 min read

The pass that reconciled public identities, honest release labels, real routes and 320-pixel project layouts.

Source: Public project catalogue and production responsive visual-QA record

The build, in five parts.

01 Built
A reconciled twelve-project catalogue with current identities, honest status labels, real links and shared mobile layout repairs.
02 Process
Each public route was read back, compared with repository truth, captured responsively and tested before catalogue claims were changed.
03 Learned
A live marketing route, a working local product and a production product are three different facts; the catalogue must not collapse them.
04 Skills
portfolio curationclaim verificationresponsive QAroute auditingcontent governance
05 Saved
Route evidence, production screenshots, status decisions, regression tests and explicit unverified boundaries.

See the milestone, not only the summary.

MarginFlip public v1 home page
A real public route used to reconcile catalogue status, identity and evidence.
MarginFlip home page at 390 pixels
Responsive proof remained a separate acceptance state rather than being inferred from desktop.

The transition#

The catalogue moved away from inherited labels and placeholder routes toward one record per actual product boundary. Growth remained unlinked where its route was intentionally unfinished, and GreyTheory retained its offline research boundary.

Visual QA#

Production routes and controlled 320/390-pixel viewports were checked for identity, readable status, media completion and horizontal overflow. Shared project-detail spacing was corrected after the responsive review exposed a gutter conflict.

What carried forward#

Every future project record needs four separately supported facts: what exists in source, what is locally verified, what is deployed and what the public route actually shows.